-
Pages
-
Categories
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- May 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- February 2022
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Cabernet Clones in Paso Robles
Know Your Cab Clones
One of the intriguing panel discussions at the CABs of Distinction event last week was “Know Your Cab Clones.”
The moderator was Matt Kettmann with Wine Enthusiast and The Santa Barbara Independent. He also writes for several other media outlets. Matt knows more than many wine writers as he, like us, also makes small lots of wine. Matt easily asked pertinent questions and moved the discussion along between the four participating winemakers. It was noted that there are numerous Cabernet Sauvignon clones available and not all clones make good wine.
Panel Discussion at CABs of Distinction
The panel of winemakers included:
Sterling Kragten from Cass Vineyard & Winery
Steve Peck at J. Lohr Vineyard & Wines
Anthony Riboli from San Antonio Winery
Kevin Willenborg from Vina Robles Vineyards & Winery
The wine tasting with different clones began with the 2014 Cabernet Sauvignon Clone 8 from the Paso Robles Geneseo District. Cass has 70 acres planted with Cabernet Sauvignon. This wine was an opaque dark ruby with dark fruit notes including blackberries. It also include spice notes. The wine had medium tannins and was full-bodied.
The second wine was from San Antonio Winery. The 2013 Cabernet Sauvignon Clone 337 was from the El Pomar District. This wine was an opaque dark ruby to black color. The wine offered dark fruit notes including cassis. This wine was full-bodied with medium to bold tannins.
Vina Robels Vineyards & Winery offered the 2015 Cabernet Sauvignon Clone 169 from the Creston District. Vina Robles has five vineyards with 12 Cabernet Sauvignon clones. This particular wine was an opaque dark purple to black color that offered blackberry notes. The wine was full-bodied with bold, kissing tannins.
J. Lohr Vineyard & Wines was the final wine for the tasting and featured Clone 7. The wine was an opaque dark purple to black color. The wine offered light, dark fruits with bold tannins and a full body.
As we tasted the wines and the winemakers talked about the wines they also emphasized what they saw as the importance of clones. It became very obvious that clones do make a difference to the winemaker and to the grower. Certain clones are better for resisting grape viruses. Other clones may produce more fruit and even the clusters of fruit may differ. By the time the grapes reach the winemaker, he will use different winemaking protocols depending on the type of grape clones. Some may be slightly higher in sugar or acidity.
However, many of the differences we noticed in the wines could be attributable to different rootstocks, different soils and different weather conditions. The panel discussions would have been improved by comparing Cabernet Sauvignons from the same vintage and the same sub AVA.
Later in the week I asked a Paso Robles winemaker, does the general wine consumer care about what clones their wine is made with? He echoed my belief that consumers are looking for good wines and wines that work well with food. Seldom do consumers ask about clones.
My advice to wine drinkers is: if you are visiting a winery and see a wine labeled with a specific clone, try it and ask questions about it. If possible taste the same varietal wine produced with a different clone from the same region and the same vintage.
Cheers!
Kathy