-
Pages
-
Categories
-
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- May 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- February 2022
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Champagne Legends and Myths
It seems today that people, including journalists, ignore the facts and make stuff up. If the fiction is mentioned enough times, it becomes true. This process can lead to legends, myths and marketing. The world of wine has its share of legends, myths and creative marketing that tends to stretch the truth. For example, there is a wine myth that white grapes make only white wines and red grapes make only red wines. This statement is so common that it is believed. Imagine a consumer’s shock when they are introduced to a white Pinot Noir, white Merlot or white Cabernet. Just as shocking was the puzzled tasting room staff at Black Prince Winery in Picton, Ontario when consumers asked for their red Chardonnay. A neighboring winery made a red Chardonnay and the consumers did not realize the blend or labeling laws. If you say something enough times, it becomes true.
What are some of the legends, myths and creative marketing used in the Champagne region? Perhaps one of the oldest myths centers around the coronation of French kings in Reims and saying they celebrated the coronation with champagne. The royal linkage in Reims is said to have started with the baptism of Clovis in Reims in 496. That is roughly 1,300 years before champagne evolved. During the centuries from 1223 until 1824, 27 French Kings were crowned in Reims. Most of those coronations may have had wines made in Champagne, some of which may have had a bit of effervescence, but they were still wines. Champagnes would only have been served during the last century or so of coronations. The wine industry marketed the concept of a “royal drink.” If you say something enough times, it becomes true.
How much truth there is in facts about events lends itself to forming legends. While in Toscana, I asked if there was any truth to the legend of the black rooster. Our guide, Catherine Leiner at Fèlsina simply stated, “Isn’t there some truth in every legend?” Champagne has the legend of Dom Pérignon, the blind monk at the Abbey of Hautvillers who invented champagne. The only truth in this legend is that there was a Dom Pérignon and he made wine. He probably wasn’t blind and he probably tried to stop effervescence in still wines not deliberately create it. Besides, the method of deliberately creating fizz with a secondary fermentation was already established prior to Dom Pérignon becoming the cellar master at the Abbey of Hautvillers. The first intentional crafted sparkling wines made in Champagne occurred about 15 years after Dom Pérignon’s death. But, if you say something enough times, it becomes true.
There may be more truth in the concept that champagne is a luxury beverage. One would have to scrutinize the definition of luxury and see how well champagne fits the definition. If one of the criteria is costs, it becomes difficult to classify champagne as a luxury drink in some areas. Much of the champagne sold in Champagne is sold by vignerons for around 12.50€ or about $13.50. The average price for champagne throughout the rest of France is 14.00€ or $15.00. If cost is the sole factor of luxury, champagne does not fit the category in France. Export it to the United States and the cost rockets. During my recent visit to a local wine shop, I observed prices of champagne in the $50.00 to $75.00 price range. At Total Wine a Veuve Cliquot Brut NV runs around $42.00 whereas a Napa Valley cabernet can cost over $100. For example a 2011 Caymus Cabernet Special Selection at $130.00. Of course there are less expensive and more expensive champagnes as well as Napa Valley Cabs. But the concept of luxury is suspect if the criteria of cost is taken into account. If you say that champagne is a luxury drink enough times, it becomes true.
Champagne marketing often uses words such as success, status and seduction. Champagne is a drink for all of those. If you want to feel good, drink champagne. If you win something, celebrate with champagne. Even if you lose, drown your sorrows with champagne. If you want to seduce someone, drink champagne. The winemaker at Barberani Winery in Umbria makes a sweet wine, Calcaia Orvieto Advanced Classic Sweet DOC “Noble Mildew.” Bernardo said, “This is a wine you can use to seduce women and girlfriends.” I asked his girlfriend if it worked, she said, “No.” How about champagne? Since fizz gets alcohol into the blood system more quickly than still wines, one can usually feel good sooner drinking a champagne than a still wine. There may be some truth to this concept.
The wine industry should seize the opportunity that myths, legends and marketing affords consumers. The wine industry can gently educate consumers. Wouldn’t it be great if a consumer asked what red wine was blended into Chardonnay to make the red Chardonnay?
Cheers,
Terry